This page will contain instruction for lawyers well as templates and precedent on how and on what basis to apply for declarative orders from the superior courts in their respective countries.

There will similarly be templates for members of the public on how to obtain protection orders from their courts of first instance.

It already contains links to documents to present to the workplace and schools trying to mandate the treatment under the guise of a vaccine.

There will be more links to the petitions, declarations, submissions, protests case law and evidence to contain in the applications together with draft pleadings and supporting affidavits.

​ Moreover, there will be precedents for members of parliament on how to move authoritative motions backed by international law and treaty law, for administrations to recognize the establishment of an independent forum for a COVID 19 international court and to get their administrations to enforce extradition orders and judgements of the said forum in their home countries.


The latest research in the proposed application in Australia for a declaration of human rights in respect of the classification of terrorist whether international, domestic or otherwise in the Supreme Court of Queensland will be posted and updated here.
(PDF) or Word

QLD Human Rights Act of 2019

Major Class action in Australia

See Make Australia Healthy Again for details

Join the class action Here

Russian ministry of defence on the USA and biological weapons:
The Australian Doherty Institute EXPOSED

Live evidence Feed

Some examples of current cases

Last December Dr Wodarg and Dr Michael Yeadon, the former vice president and chief scientist of Pfizer for allergy and respiratory conditions, filed an urgent application with the European Medicine Agency for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine clinical trials, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer trials, citing concerns about female fertility. Their application also cited concerns about PCR testing, saying all “endpoints” of COVID-19 cases used to determine vaccine efficacy in the Phase 3 or 2/3 trials should have their infection status confirmed by “appropriate Sanger sequencing” because of high cycle thresholds used in some trials and “design flaws of certain RT-qPCR tests identical to or modeled after what is sometimes called the “Drosten-Test”.”

Wodarg Yeadon EMA Petition - Pfizer Trial (PDF)

Lisbon court rules only 0.9% of ‘verified cases’ died of COVID, numbering 152, not 17,000 claimed

Portugal Re Covid Deaths (PDF)

Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) states that Americans in a clinical study must give their written consent to any medical treatment such as vaccination. Since vaccines gain licensure from the FDA by passing through 3 out of 4 safety trials, the side effect ratio is never truly known till the vaccine is used widely by millions. All Americans who receive the vaccine will still be enrolled in surveillance studies (Stage-4) and subject to the CFR protections. According to Title 21:50B of the CFR, informed consent requires candidates for vaccination to be given the right to refuse vaccination; have the right to confidentiality (privacy) that their vaccination data will not be shared with other parties without their consent; and have the right to know if there are any alternatives to vaccination.

Great Barrington Declaration

As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.
Great Barrington Declaration


Official and Personal Notice of Liability
Any use of 'implied consent" by any minor child under the age of 18 is defined in law as gross, contributory, and culpable criminal negligence. Any party found to be involved in vaccination coercion when entrusted with the care of our children will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

Notice of Potential Liability for Lack of Informed Consent
When Administering Experimental Vaccines Consider this an official notice that you may be personally liable for injuries sustained by individuals from these experimental vaccines should you refuse to inform your vaccine recipients of these risks...

Any compulsory Covid-19 vaccination requirement is a violation of federal law.

Brought under the Class Proceedings Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 50​

Download File (PDF)

Application in the case to show evidence of the virus
Download File (PDF)

Court order in ACDP Case
Download File (PDF)

Portugal case ruling
Download File (PDF)

Coronavirus sceptic wins court case about mandatory PCR testing in Holland
The judge said the family have the right to protest about being forced to undergo a PCR test against their will.

Landmark defamation case will take down ‘fact checked’ PCR test fraud

Court Rules Germany’s Lockdown Restrictions are Unconstitutional Weimar District Court, Ruling of April 8th, 2021 - English Translation

Download File (PDF)

“Based on the rules of criminal law, asserting false facts concerning the PCR tests or intentional misrepresentation, as conducted by Messrs. Drosten and Wieler and the WHO, this can only be interpreted as fraud,” he explained. “Based on the rules of the civil tort law, this translates into intentional infliction of damage." “Under tort laws, all those harmed by these PCR test-induced lockdowns are entitled to full compensation for their losses,” he added. “In particular, there is a duty to compensate – that is a duty to pay damages – to companies and self-employed persons as a result of the lockdown and other measures."
Dr Reiner Feullmich

Great document citing laws codes and asking the employer to complete a questionaire

VERY Important.

Print and keep a copy at hand

I would add to the questionaire that if they insist that I receive my rights to claim for consequential losses, injury and damages. Make them sign a written ultimatum to you.

Make them sign that they read the Nuremberg code and federal regulations.

Download File (PDF)

Cornell International Law Journal Volume 41 Issue 1 Winter 2008 Article 9 Brave New World: Neurowarfare and the Limits of International Humanitarian Law

Download File (PDF)

People for Safe Vaccines have a crack legal team and some very good information on their about us tab. Also check out the correspondence on their Chronology tab, as well as their bioweapons tab

People for safe Vaccines liks:
People For Safe Vaccines (Home Page)
A Chronology of Communication
People For Safe Vaccines - Bioweapons

Some information on status. As what will you litigate? A citizen or a people? So then who do you represent and at what bar?
Watch Video

Dr David Martin who has been following the research, money, patents and International Biological Warfare Conventions for decades is making real progress. A good video summary of the status quo relating to his latest efforts can be viewed at Forbidden Knowledge TV. A summary of his court cases can be found at his site Prosecute Now. His litigation resulted in mask mandates being removed from USA air travel (PDF). The latest Indictment against Joe Biden and others (PDF) is also featured as is a great overview of the history (PDF) and executive summary of court pleadings (PDF).

Join our Telegram for updates

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙